The October Standing
The first monthly decline in the measured book, and why almost all of it sits in two business books. 25 venues graded, four of them new.
After five months of growth, the measured book shrank — almost entirely in two business books.
Across the 21 venues AfriFlux tracked in both September and October, stablecoin flow fell from $996.0M to $802.3M, down 19.5%. It is the first monthly decline since the Index began measuring.
The slowdown had been building. Month-on-month growth across the same venues went from +14.6% in June to +12.0%, then +9.9%, then +6.0% in September. October turned it negative.
Where the decline sits
The decline is narrow. Two venues whose books are mostly business flow account for 97% of it. Obiex fell from $703.5M to $565.1M, down $138.4M. Flutterwave fell $49.0M, a third of its September volume.
The other 19 venues together slipped about 4.4%, from $144.0M to $137.6M. October was a month in which the largest business books pulled back. It was not a broad retreat.
The book fell by a fifth. Outside two business books, it barely moved.
Four venues joined the Index this month: VALR ($17.1M in October), Luno ($8.9M), Divest ($3.9M) and Hisa ($27.1k). With them, the 25 venues in the October standing moved $832.2M. Joiners enter at their first standing; they carry no change from September.
The October Standing
Spenda keeps the top spot at A 77.6. Its October volume was essentially flat (−0.3%), and its score dipped 1.5 points as its consistency reading eased. Monica (A 74.4), Jeroid (A 73.6) and Timon (A 70.4) all moved up into A, so four venues now hold an A grade. Scores rose for 11 venues, fell for 9 and were unchanged for 1; the 4 new joiners have no prior month to compare against. Only some of those moves crossed a grade band.
| # | Venue | Grade | Score | Mom | Con | Coverage | Δ vs Sep | Driver |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Spenda | A | 77.6 | 76 | 80.0 | Full | −1.5 | consistency |
| 2 | Monica | A | 74.4 | 60 | 96.0 | Partial | +7.1BBB→A | consistency |
| 3 | Jeroid | A | 73.6 | 64 | 88.0 | Partial | +11.9BBB→A | momentum |
| 4 | Timon | A | 70.4 | 72 | 68.0 | Full | +5.9BBB→A | momentum |
| 5 | Roqqu | BBB | 68.8 | 48 | 100.0 | Full | +1.5 | momentum |
| 6 | Breet | BBB | 67.2 | 88 | 36.0 | Full | +6.3 | momentum |
| 7 | Flutterwave | BBB | 66.5 | 96 | 22.5 | Partial | +0.6 | consistency |
| 8 | Obiex | BBB | 64.0 | 56 | 76.0 | Partial | +3.1 | momentum |
| 9 | Raenest | BBB | 61.6 | 92 | 16.0 | Full | +2.5BB→BBB | momentum |
| 10 | Grey Finance | BBB | 60.0 | 68 | 48.0 | Full | +20.0B→BBB | momentum |
| 11 | SFx | BBB | 60.0 | 84 | 24.0 | Full | 0.0 | consistency |
| 12 | VALR | BB | 58.4 | 36 | 92.0 | Full | NEW | — |
| 13 | Daya Pro | BB | 56.9 | 84 | 15.5 | Full | −0.4 | consistency |
| 14 | Payrit | BB | 51.2 | 80 | 8.0 | Full | +2.1B→BB | momentum |
| 15 | Divest | BB | 50.4 | 28 | 84.0 | Partial | NEW | — |
| 16 | Quidax | B | 47.2 | 52 | 40.0 | Partial | −11.0BB→B | momentum |
| 17 | Hisa | B | 41.4 | 44 | 37.2 | Full | NEW | — |
| 18 | Busha | B | 40.0 | 24 | 64.0 | Partial | −1.8 | momentum |
| 19 | Accrue | CCC | 39.2 | 44 | 32.0 | Full | +3.7 | momentum |
| 20 | Onboard Global | CCC | 33.6 | 16 | 60.0 | Full | −1.9 | momentum |
| 21 | Luno | CCC | 33.6 | 8 | 72.0 | Full | NEW | — |
| 22 | Paj Cash | CCC | 29.6 | 20 | 44.0 | Full | −9.5 | consistency |
| 23 | Azza | CCC | 28.0 | 12 | 52.0 | Full | −1.1 | consistency |
| 24 | Chipper Cash | D | 24.8 | 4 | 56.0 | Full | −5.2CCC→D | consistency |
| 25 | Bayse Markets | D | 24.0 | 32 | 12.0 | Full | −32.4BB→D | momentum |
Δ is measured against September recomputed on current data; the published September issue stands as written. NEW marks a venue in its first standing. Coverage describes data availability and does not directly move a grade: 18 venues are on Full coverage, 7 on Partial. Flutterwave is graded on its business book. Evolution left the Index in October and is shown as Inactive on the board.
Why a falling month lifted eleven scores
The Index grades growth and steadiness relative to the field, not size. A venue’s Momentum is the median of its monthly growth rates over the last year, ranked against every other venue. So in a month where most books shrank, a venue that shrank less moves up the ranking.
Jeroid is the clearest case. Its October volume fell 5.1%, and its score still rose 11.9 points to A. Its own median growth slipped from +10.0% to +6.3%; it did not accelerate. The field around it slowed more. A flat October would have produced the identical score.
A median records where a month falls, not how far.
What actual acceleration looks like
Grey Finance is the month’s clean positive case: B → BBB, +20.0. October grew 10.9%, more than double its own typical month (+4.5%).
Strip out the month that aged out of its window, and October alone added 3.2 points to Grey’s median. That is a venue accelerating, not one benefiting from a weak field: a flat October would have left its median where it was.
Breet (+6.3) and Timon (+5.9) also improved on their own growth, posting +16.7% and +9.7% in October.
Relative improvement is not acceleration. Most of October’s risers held up while the field fell. Grey got faster.
Why three venues fell
Bayse Markets · BB → D, −32.4
The steepest fall in the standing, and a real one. October fell 36.8% after September fell 32.1%. Two consecutive large declines pulled its median growth from +37.5% to +1.6%, and October’s own reading accounts for almost all of that.
Quidax · BB → B, −11.0
October fell 7.2%, below its usual pace. As in September, part of the move is the window: a strong month (+27.3%) aged out, and a flat October would have scored the same. It is a reading of position, not of collapse.
Paj Cash · −9.5, despite October growing 19.9%
Its fall came from Consistency, not Momentum. Paj Cash’s month-to-month swings widened, its Consistency reading fell from 77.3 to 44, and the Index rewards steadiness alongside growth.
When the numbers look wrong
VALR and Luno are graded on the customer deposits AfriFlux publishes for them. The desk-sized deposits excluded from those published figures stay out of the Index too, so a venue’s grade and its venue page describe the same book.
The board recomputes past months on current data. Late-arriving transfers can nudge an earlier month’s score. A published issue is fixed as written: the September report stands, and this issue’s changes are measured against September as it reads today.
Evolution left the Index this month after it stopped operating. Its earlier standings remain and are marked Inactive.
Accrue returns to normal grading. Its score was frozen in September during an infrastructure migration; its new rail is now measured.
How the field is distributed
| Category | Venues | Median score | Range |
|---|---|---|---|
| Off-ramps | 7 | 67.2 | 28.0–77.6 |
| Business payments | 1 | 66.5 | — |
| Exchanges | 7 | 56.9 | 33.6–68.8 |
| Neobanks | 8 | 55.6 | 24.8–70.4 |
| Savings & investments | 1 | 41.4 | — |
| Prediction markets | 1 | 24.0 | — |
Off-ramps lead on median score across seven venues. Neobanks are the largest cohort, with eight venues, and the widest spread. Grade bands this month: A 4 · BBB 7 · BB 4 · B 3 · CCC 5 · D 2.
How the grade is built
The grade of record is Momentum (60%) + Consistency (40%), scored 0–100 and mapped to bands from AAA to D. Both pillars read the trailing twelve complete months of month-on-month growth in a venue’s measured stablecoin book.
Momentum is the median of those growth rates, never the mean, so one spike cannot fake growth; that median is then peer-ranked across the field. Consistency is the median absolute deviation of the same series, measured around the venue’s own median growth, so steady expansion reads as consistent rather than volatile.
Each pillar is shrunk toward neutral by how much of its own window a venue can fill. The standing is always the last complete month, published on the first of the following month. A published standing is frozen: a venue mapped after a month closed joins from the next cycle.
Business-only venues are graded on their business book (Flutterwave). Customer-capped venues are graded on the customer deposits AfriFlux publishes for them (VALR, Luno).
Grades describe Index standing, not overall company quality, product quality, market share or financial health.
Coverage labels describe data availability; they do not directly move a venue’s grade.
All figures are measured across the venues AfriFlux tracks and are not a census of the market. Volumes are stablecoin flow observed onchain, not self-reported.